David Tennant

David Tennant

There are just those people that can not get over the fact that David Tennant is longer the Doctor. Those people seriously need to get over it. If you were only watching the show for David Tennant, then you may not be a fan of and you do not get what Doctor Who is all about.

Doctor who is all about renewal, nothing is forever in on Doctor Who and even the Doctor gets a new face every so often. Part of the whole appeal of the show is who is the new Doctor going to be and how long will they be around for and who will replace them.

Besides there were three outcomes for David's time as the Doctor. The first one being what did happen, David decided that he wanted to leave on top when the show was still fun and he still loved it, the job and the Doctor. He did not want to stick around till it became a JOB!!! The second and third outcomes both involve David staying much longer then he wanted too, the fans wanted him too and the BBC wanted him too. If David had remained on the show for a few more years there is the possibility he becomes to comfortable or just too jaded, and that starts to effect his performance. Which he either becomes feed up with the show and everyone involved in the production that he leaves the show and has nothing positive say about the situation; or his performance starts to slip and fans soon start turning the channel which will cause the numbers to dip leading to the BBC removing him from the role.

So instead of bitching that David is no longer around, be happy for him. He got to live out his dream of playing the most coveted role in all of British television. If on the other hand you can not get over it and you just can't come around to support the wonderful young actor that is Matt Smith, then you may not be a Doctor Who fan and need to find something else to due on Saturdays. Matt has showed that he is worthy of walking in the shoes of the actors that came before that had the honor of playing the Doctor, from William Hartnell all the way to David Tennant.

Sieve-Minded

Sieve-Minded

In my early to mid twenties I decided I was a open-minded person, that I was willing to listen to all sides of the argument before I decided which side I was on. Even if I already had a side I would be open to new information to challenge what I believed. I find it is important to always question the things you hold dear more then you do everything else in the world.

I was proud of the fact that I was open-minded, for a few years. That was until I discovered the radio program Coast-to-Coast. For those that do not know about this show they showcase the paranormal, conspiracy theories and other types of woo-woo. At first I thought this show was mostly harmless and I enjoyed listening to it, for I thought it was just entertainment. But as I continued to listen I soon learned that the people that were on this show were serious about all the nonsense they were talking about.

The guest are given a platform to spew their views on such subjects as ghost, UFOs, big foot, secret societies without any challenge from the host. So they can say whatever they like without having to show any evidence to prove what they are saying. They also are not being faced with evidence that in most part
destroy the arguments they are advancing.

Coast -to-Coast is much like the four Gospels in New Testament of the Bible. One night, for example, they will have on some one that is an “expert” on ghost and hauntings. The host will let the guest tell his stories and what he believes in. This “expert” will give all his rules on this topic, and never once does the host question any of this. A week or two or three later (this is important) the topic of ghost and hauntings will be the topic of the night, but this time there is a new “expert”; they will be on to tell their stories and their rules for this topic. Then some more time will pass and then another “expert” will be on to given their point of view on this subject.

Now while “expert” A will say something different then “expert” B and “experts” A and B will be saying something different then “expert” C is saying. Even though all three guest will have different views on the topic of ghost and hauntings, there are still some points that flow through all their views. These are usually things that date back to earlier times, say the dark ages. If you listen to these shows on the night they are on, you may not notice the differences.

Now here is were the comparison to the Gospels comes into play. If you read the Gospels in a vertical way, you may notice small differences in the stories, but for the most part the Gospel stories seem to all be the same. But if you take and read the Gospels horizontally (side-by-side) you notice that the Gospels may be telling the same story, but they do not agree on that story at all. The same way with the “experts” A, B, C on ghost and hauntings. They all agree that there are ghost and haunting, they just don’t agree on how these things take place.

Worst then the guest and the host are the listeners that call in. They are most credulous group of people that you will ever meet. While the guest may come on spewing nonsense, and the host does not challenge the “experts” the callers take what they have heard and not only believe it, but they take what they have heard and combine it with all other types of woo-woo. The worst of these callers are the ones that take all the things they hear on Coast-to-Coast and give their views on how this all fits in with Christianity. Even the though Church speaks about such nonsense, the callers can find verses that they interpret so they can believe all this stuff.

One of the things you will always hear these people say, that they are open-minded. The amazing thing is that these people are open to every ideal out there except for facts, the truth and science. They will believe anything that someone will tell them, as long as there is no evidence for it, but if you show them something reality based, they will reject it every time.

I soon decided that I was not open-minded after all, or at least not as open-minded as these people are. But I was not closed minded either.

Soon other events in my life keep me from me having time to listening to Coast-to-Coast. I just could not stay up in the middle of the night and listen to nut-jobs, and I was not going to spend money I did not have to be able to listen to the show whenever I wanted to.

What I soon did discover was skeptical podcast. My first podcast was The Skeptic’s Guide to the Universe. Here I found people that believe in science, evidence and facts, all things that I believed in. Also they would say that you should not believe something just because they said it, they were not experts, that you should look this stuff up for yourself. Something that you never heard on Coast-to-Coast. All the “experts” on Coast-to-Coast claim to be the authorities on what they are talking about, and those people that do not agree with them are part of a conspiracy against them.

The skeptical podcast were a breath of fresh air.

So I am not open-minded, I am not close-minded, but what is it that I do believe in? I come up with an answer, I am Sieve-minded. What does this mean? Sieve-minded means I take in all available knowledge and my mind will keep what makes sense, what is supported by evidence, facts and science, and all else falls straight on through. I believe this describes how I think.